Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473105›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Investigation of the gut parasitic community composition in

Sitong Chen, Xianghe Wang, Xinyu Liu, Meiling Xie, Fuyu An, Kai Wang, Zhenquan Zhang, Shuo Zhou, Yan Hua

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sitong Chen *College of Life Sciences, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China.
Xianghe Wang *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyu LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.
Meiling XieGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.
Fuyu AnGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.
Kai WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenquan ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.
Shuo ZhouCollege of Life Sciences, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China.
Yan HuaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The critically endangered Methods: In this study, 72 fecal samples were collected from captive Results: Our results revealed significant differences in the composition of parasitic communities across species and sex groups. Several potentially pathogenic helminths and protozoa were identified. The helminths included Rhabditida, Moniliformida, and Diplogasterida. Protozoan taxa such as Discussion: This study systematically characterized the gastrointestinal parasitic communities in captive

Indexed as

18S rRNAManis javanicaManis pentadactylapotentially pathogenic parasiteswildlife

Identifiers

PMID41473105
PMCPMC12745440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.