Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473082›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2025

Safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction after esophagectomy for esophageal neuromotor disease: A single-institution experience.

Samantha L Savitch, Jonathan E Williams, Andrew C Chang, Rishindra Reddy, Jules Lin, Mark B Orringer, Kiran H Lagisetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samantha L SavitchSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Jonathan E WilliamsSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Andrew C ChangSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Rishindra ReddySection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Jules LinSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Mark B OrringerSection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Kiran H LagisettySection of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.

Funding

Physician Scientist Training in Age-Related DiseasesT32AG062403 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MIN, LILLIAN CHIANG, MODY, LONA · 2020 to 2025
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG062403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Esophagectomy remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with end-stage esophageal neuromotor diseases, yet there are limited data on outcomes after esophagectomy in this population. We sought to characterize the safety and efficacy of esophagectomy for esophageal neuromotor disease. Methods: We retrospectively queried a prospectively collected database of all esophagectomies performed at our institution from 1975 to 2023 for patients without cancer diagnosed with end-stage esophageal neuromotor disease. Operative characteristics, perioperative and functional outcomes, and mortality were evaluated. Patients with and without a previous esophageal operation were compared using χ Results: We identified 237 patients for analysis. The majority were female (57.0%), White (82.7%), and nonsmokers (83.7%). Mean age was 52.4 years. In total, 185 (78.1%) patients had a diagnosis of achalasia, and 72.2% of patients underwent a previous esophageal operation. The majority of esophagectomies (91.6%) were transhiatal, and a gastric conduit was used in 228 patients (96.2%). Anastomotic leak rate was 9.7% (23/237). One-year mortality was 2.5% (6/237). There were no differences in outcomes between patients who had and had not had a previous esophageal operation. Postoperative functional symptoms were reported in 69.7% of patients at first follow-up, and 97 (40.9%) patients required postoperative dilation for symptom management. The majority of patients reported that they felt better (72%) and would undergo esophagectomy again (72%). Conclusions: Esophagectomy for esophageal neuromotor disease is safe and feasible with a gastric conduit, regardless of prior esophageal operations. Despite persistent postoperative functional symptoms, patients have high satisfaction after the procedure.

Indexed as

achalasiaesophageal dysmotilityesophagectomymega esophagus

Identifiers

PMID41473082
PMCPMC12745112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.