ArticleJTCVS open2025
Safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction after esophagectomy for esophageal neuromotor disease: A single-institution experience.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heller myotomy in achalasia: clinical implications from long-term outcomes.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Esophagectomy remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with end-stage esophageal neuromotor diseases, yet there are limited data on outcomes after esophagectomy in this population. We sought to characterize the safety and efficacy of esophagectomy for esophageal neuromotor disease. Methods: We retrospectively queried a prospectively collected database of all esophagectomies performed at our institution from 1975 to 2023 for patients without cancer diagnosed with end-stage esophageal neuromotor disease. Operative characteristics, perioperative and functional outcomes, and mortality were evaluated. Patients with and without a previous esophageal operation were compared using χ Results: We identified 237 patients for analysis. The majority were female (57.0%), White (82.7%), and nonsmokers (83.7%). Mean age was 52.4 years. In total, 185 (78.1%) patients had a diagnosis of achalasia, and 72.2% of patients underwent a previous esophageal operation. The majority of esophagectomies (91.6%) were transhiatal, and a gastric conduit was used in 228 patients (96.2%). Anastomotic leak rate was 9.7% (23/237). One-year mortality was 2.5% (6/237). There were no differences in outcomes between patients who had and had not had a previous esophageal operation. Postoperative functional symptoms were reported in 69.7% of patients at first follow-up, and 97 (40.9%) patients required postoperative dilation for symptom management. The majority of patients reported that they felt better (72%) and would undergo esophagectomy again (72%). Conclusions: Esophagectomy for esophageal neuromotor disease is safe and feasible with a gastric conduit, regardless of prior esophageal operations. Despite persistent postoperative functional symptoms, patients have high satisfaction after the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.