ArticleJTCVS open2025
Distal anastomotic new-entry tear after type A aortic dissection repair: Incidence patterns and long-term outcomes by extent of aortic replacement.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study objective was to investigate the incidence patterns, anatomic distribution, and long-term outcomes of distal anastomotic new-entry tear in acute type A aortic dissection according to the extent of aortic replacement. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 409 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent surgical repair between 2003 and 2023. Patients were categorized by the extent of aortic replacement: hemiarch replacement (n = 173), partial arch replacement (n = 126), and total arch replacement (n = 110). Distal anastomotic new-entry tear was identified using postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Long-term outcomes were distal anastomotic new-entry tear status (distal anastomotic new-entry tear vs nondistal anastomotic new-entry tear) and the extent of aortic replacement (hemiarch replacement, partial arch replacement, and total arch replacement). Results: Distal anastomotic new-entry tears occurred in 27.4% of the patients, predominantly in the greater curve of aortic arch across all replacement types. Supra-aortic branch dissection was an independent risk factor for distal anastomotic new-entry tear occurrence (odds ratio, 2.80, Conclusions: Distal anastomotic new-entry tear commonly develops at the greater curve of the aortic arch after acute type A aortic dissection repair and substantially increases the risk of distal reoperation after hemiarch replacement and partial arch replacement but not total arch replacement, suggesting that total arch replacement may protect against distal anastomotic new-entry tear-related reoperations, particularly in patients with supra-aortic branch dissection. Careful surgical planning and long-term surveillance are crucial for optimizing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.