ArticleJTCVS open2025
Outcomes after postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in young patients: An individual patient data meta-analysis.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the early and midterm mortality of young patients treated for cardiogenic shock with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) after adult cardiac surgery. Methods: Studies reporting the outcome after postcardiotomy VA-ECMO in adult patients were identified through a systematic review of the literature. Individual patient-level data were provided by the authors of 10 studies. Results: Data on 1268 patients treated at 25 hospitals were included in this study. Adjusted analysis identified 40 years of age as a cutoff value for in-hospital and mid-term mortality. Patients aged >40 years had significantly greater in-hospital mortality (1129 patients, crude rates 68.8% vs 43.1%, adjusted odds ratio, 3.267; 95% confidence interval, 1.970-5.425) and mortality at 24-month (109 patients, crude rates 73.7% vs 45.0%, adjusted hazard ratio, 3.530, 95% confidence interval, 2.571-4.844). Twelve (11.0%) patients aged ≤40 years received a ventricular assist device and heart transplantation, whereas this strategy was adopted in 33 (2.9%) patients aged >40 years ( Conclusions: The present findings suggest that early and midterm mortality after postcardiotomy VA-ECMO is significantly lower in patients aged ≤40 years compared to older patients. However, mortality remains substantial also among these young patients and heart-replacement therapies are infrequently performed in this subset of patients likely because of severe perioperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.