Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473062›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2025

A novel robotic-assisted lung lobectomy simulation model.

Carolyn C Chang, Ntemena Kapula, Jake J Kim, Ashley Choi, Irmina A Elliott, Douglas Z Liou, Leah M Backhus, Mark F Berry, Joseph B Shrager, Brandon A Guenthart and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carolyn C ChangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Ntemena KapulaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Jake J KimDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Ashley ChoiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Irmina A ElliottDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Douglas Z LiouDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Leah M BackhusDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Mark F BerryDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Joseph B ShragerDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Brandon A GuenthartDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Natalie S LuiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although most thoracic surgery programs seek robotic-competent partners, more than one half of graduating residents report needing more training. We aimed to develop a reproducible, high-fidelity model that serves as an effective training tool for surgeons at all levels. Methods: Porcine heart-lung blocks were prepped for a left upper lobectomy and cannulated to distend the vasculature using an artificial blood substitute capable of simulating bleeding. A linear actuator was positioned beneath a platform to simulate a heartbeat, and a da Vinci Xi robotic system (Intuitive Surgical) was docked above it. Participants performed 3 key steps of a left upper lobectomy, then evaluated fidelity of model features and training value using the Likert scale. Pre- and postsimulation confidence were reported (institutional review board approval no. 76506). Results: Among 20 participants, 15 were trainees (75%) and 5 were faculty (25%). Trainees reported a median of 26 bedside (interquartile range, 15-48) and 5 console cases (interquartile range, 3-30). Faculty experience ranged from <5 to >20 years. The model was rated highly for fidelity, with 100% (n = 9) of features receiving a Likert score ≥4 from faculty, with stapling rated highest (5.0 ± 0.0). Trainees rated 89% of features ≥4, with stapling (4.7 ± 0.4) and lung tissue handling (4.7 ± 0.5) rated highest. Both groups rated the simulation as highly valuable, with trainee confidence significantly improving postsimulation (2.5-3.9, Conclusions: The model was rated highly for fidelity and value by both trainees and faculty, and significantly improved trainee confidence. This model offers an effective and reproducible training tool for individual program implementation.

Indexed as

high fidelitylow costlung lobectomyrobotic lung lobectomyrobotic thoracic surgerysimulation modelsurgical education

Identifiers

PMID41473062
PMCPMC12745124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.