ArticleJTCVS open2025
Propensity-matched analysis of the impact of saphenous vein graft external stenting on clinical outcomes in coronary bypass surgery: The RESTART study.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vein Graft Preservation During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Operative Techniques, Biomaterials and Advances from Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: External saphenous vein graft stenting has been shown to reduce intimal hyperplasia, lumen irregularities, and flow disturbances after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of saphenous vein graft external stenting on clinical outcomes up to 5 years. Methods: Outcomes for patients who received external vein graft stenting in an international, real-world cohort were compared in a propensity matched analysis with patients from the Arterial Revascularization Trial (ISRCTN46552265). All eligible patients required an internal mammary artery graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery, received at least one vein graft, and survived to discharge. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 1 year after surgery, consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and cerebrovascular accident. Secondary end points included 5-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events with and without stroke and annualized target vessel revascularization. Results: In total, 789 treated and 2205 control patients were included. At 1 year after CABG, the weighted hazard ratio comparing outcomes between treated and control patients was 0.60 (90% confidence interval, 0.38-0.94, Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that external vein graft stenting is associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing adverse clinical outcomes up to 5 years after surgery compared with standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.