ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025
Blood pressure indices for predicting incident cardiovascular disease: A 13-year follow-up study in Japanese population.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several blood pressure (BP) indices have been associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, evidence comparing their long-term prognostic value in Asian populations is limited. We investigated the association between multiple BP indices and CVD risk over a 13-year follow-up period in a large Japanese population. Methods: Data from a health check-up program conducted by the Panasonic Corporation covering 166 operational sites from 2008 to 2021, including 163,956 participants not receiving anti-hypertensive drugs, were analyzed. The primary outcome was the incidence of three-point major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, nonfatal coronary artery disease, and nonfatal stroke. Cox proportional hazards models and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to evaluate the associations between the four BP indices (systolic BP [SBP], diastolic BP [DBP], pulse pressure [PP], and mean arterial pressure [MAP]) and incident MACE. Results: After adjusting for confounders, all four BP indices were found to be independently associated with incident MACE. Among them, MAP demonstrated the highest area under the ROC curve for predicting MACE. In the gender-stratified analyses, the findings in males were broadly consistent with the overall results, whereas the predictive advantage of MAP was attenuated in females. Similarly, in analyses restricted to participants aged ≥50 years, the superiority of the MAP was less evident. Conclusions: MAP was the strongest predictor of incident CVD in the Japanese population. These findings underscore the importance of BP phenotyping and suggest that gender and age may modify the utility of MAP in cardiovascular risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.