ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025
Association between simultaneous exposure to socioeconomic disadvantages and cardiovascular health of Brazilian adolescents.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elevated uric acid levels link to a higher cardiometabolic risk profile in adolescents.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Socioeconomic inequities affect cardiovascular outcomes in adults, but their cumulative effect in adolescents remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between simultaneous exposure to different socioeconomic disadvantages and cardiovascular health (CVH) in Brazilian adolescents. Methods: The sample consisted of 34,831 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, participants of the Brazilian Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents Study (ERICA), a national, school-based, cross-sectional, multicenter study. CVH was assessed using the Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score, which ranges from 0 to 100 points and is composed of eight metrics grouped into two domains: health behaviors (diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, and sleep duration) and health factors (body mass index, non-HDL cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure). Simultaneous exposure to socioeconomic disadvantages was assessed using five variables: parental education, family structure, possession of goods, type of school, and skin color. The total number of exposures ranged from 0 to 5. Linear regression models adjusted for sex and age were used to evaluate the association between simultaneous exposure to socioeconomic disadvantages and CVH. Results: The simultaneous exposure to at least two socioeconomic disadvantages was 80.7 %, while the average LE8 score was 75.9 (95 % CI 75.5-76.4). The higher the number of simultaneous exposures to the investigated socioeconomic disadvantages, the worse the CVH of Brazilian adolescents. Those exposed to all the investigated disadvantages simultaneously had a reduction of 4.5 points in the LE8. Physical activity and smoking were the LE8 components most impacted by socioeconomic disadvantages. Belonging to a fragmented family structure appeared to have the greatest impact on CVH. Conclusion: Simultaneous exposure to multiple socioeconomic disadvantages was associated with poorer CVH in Brazilian adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.