ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
'Publish or Perish!': perception and self-appraisal of Indian physicians on academic publications: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Research and academic publications are crucial for Indian physicians' professional growth, evidence generation, and academic advancement. It often contributes to the "publish or perish" culture. This study aims to assess Indian physicians' perceptions and self-appraisal on academic publications, for those practicing evidence-based medicine (EBM). Methodology: A cross-sectional online survey with proper consent was conducted over two months, targeting Indian physicians practicing EBM to evaluate their views on research and publications. Results: A total of 320 physicians participated (mean age 41.15 ± 8.94 years; 68.8% male). Most held post-graduate degrees (73.4%) and worked in government-run institutions (56.6%). A large proportion (88.7%) had prior publications, with a preference for PubMed/Medline-indexed journals (40.0%). Sixty-five percent balanced clinical and academic roles. Physicians were motivated by career advancement (31.6%) and professional recognition (34.7%). Behavioral patterns showed "addiction-like" tendencies, with many frequently checking publication metrics and tracking manuscript progress. Physicians with post-graduate qualifications, particularly in medicine, were more engaged in these behaviors. Those in central government teaching institutions showed even greater engagement. Conclusion: This study reveals the complex dynamics of academic publishing among Indian physicians, highlighting the pressures of the "publish or perish" culture. Institutions should focus on fostering quality over quantity in publishing, providing mentorship, and promoting ethical practices to mitigate these pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.