ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
Association of Anaemia and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This research aims to find out the prevalence of depression in all types of anaemia patients of all age groups and genders by conducting a comprehensive meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies. Methodology: The relevant peer-reviewed literature describing primary data analysis was thoroughly evaluated using the PRISMA checklist as a reference. We searched databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar, to identify research publications published between 2003 and 2024. R software version 4.3.0 was utilised to perform the meta-analysis, and the JBI score was employed for quality appraisal. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q and I2 statistics. To pool estimates, a random-effects model was employed. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's regression test. Results: After combining the results of the papers, the prevalence of depression was estimated at 36 % (CI = 95: 28-45 %) based on a random effects model. Sub-group analysis showed that the prevalence of depression was higher in patients with sickle cell anaemia (42%) followed by Thalassemia (35%) and Iron deficiency anaemia (20%). Sub-group analysis also found a higher prevalence (almost double) of depression in anaemic patients of Asia (40%) and the African continent (37%,) which is almost double as compared to America (28%) and Europe (20%). The declining trend of meta-regression analysis demonstrates that depression prevalence is higher among young anaemia patients (Children and adolescents) as compared to older ones. Conclusion: Routine screening for depression may be required during regular follow-ups of anaemic patients, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.