Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Effects of Individualized Step Targets on Physical Activity in COPD. A Randomized Study.
Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Improving physical activity (PA) is important in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Goal setting can be a possible intervention to improve PA, but the increase in PA is not sustainable in the long term. We evaluated the effects of providing an individualized target step count, reflecting the disease condition of each patient, on PA and other factors, such as myokines, after six months in patients with COPD. Patients and Methods: We performed a randomized parallel group, open-label study (INTAR-Step study) between the target provision (intervention) group and the usual care (control) group and investigated differences in the proportion of subjects who achieved the target as a primary outcome and differences in changes in PA parameters and myokines as secondary outcomes. This study was registered with UMIN-CTR (UMIN000046390, January 13, 2022). Results: A total of 73 subjects were analyzed (intervention, n=38; control, n=35). The proportion of participants in the intervention group who achieved their target step count did not show a significant increase relative to the control group (p=0.157). However, the change in step count, and change in duration of activity at ≥3.0 metabolic equivalents were significantly increased in the intervention group. The Changes in the Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), fatty acid-binding protein-3, and Irisin levels also increased in the intervention group. Furthermore, GDF-15 levels were significantly higher in subjects with increased step counts than in those with decreased step counts. Conclusion: Providing individualized step targets did not increase the proportion of subjects who achieved their targets, but it increased their step counts after six months. GDF-15 may be involved in the increase in the step count.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.