ArticleProstate international2025
Multimodality focal therapy for prostate cancer: outcome of the
Article in Prostate international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic potentials of curcumin in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review of pathways and clinical prospects.Prostate international · 2026Review
- Advances in focal therapy for prostate cancer: current modalities, outcomes, and future directions.Prostate international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our study reported the outcome of a multimodality focal therapy (FT) cohort for localized primary prostate cancer. Methods: In a prospective registry all patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy (fusion targeted or template biopsy) before FT. Modalities included focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), focal cryotherapy, or targeted microwave ablation (TMA). Postoperatively, prostate-specific antigen and functional outcome assessment with validated questionnaires were checked 3 monthly. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months. Elective prostate biopsy was performed between 6 and 12 months. Results: A total of 102 patients underwent FT between 2019 and 2024. The cohort consisted of 44 (43.1%) patients for focal HIFU, 18 (17.6%) patients for focal cryotherapy, and 40 (39.2%) patients for TMA. D'Amico low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients accounted for 31 (30.4%), 66 (64.7%), and 5 (4.9%) patients, respectively. Referring to tumor location, focal HIFU had 38 (86.4%) posterior tumors, focal cryotherapy had 12 (72.2%) anterior tumors, and TMA had 31 (77.5%) anterior tumors. Biopsy data were available for 63 patients (61.8%). Clinically significant recurrence (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group: ≥2) were found in 7 patients (11.1%). Subsequent salvage treatment included the following cases: robotic radical prostatectomy: 2, radiotherapy: 4, and second focal cryotherapy: 1. No deterioration in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite score was observed across all domains before and after the treatment. Improvement in the Urinary Irritative/Obstructive domain was observed in focal cryotherapy (78.3 vs. 91.5, Conclusions: Multimodality FT with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.