Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472887›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in ophthalmology2025

Eye movement abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative dementias: insights from current evidence and priorities for future research.

Evangelos Anagnostou, Georgios Armenis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evangelos AnagnostouDepartment of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Georgios ArmenisDepartment of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye movement abnormalities are increasingly recognized as early and sensitive markers of neurodegenerative dementias, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD). Disruptions in saccadic, antisaccadic, smooth pursuit, fixation, and naturalistic eye movement tasks reflect dysfunction in frontal, parietal, subcortical, and cerebellar circuits that are vulnerable to neurodegeneration. Studies have consistently demonstrated that AD patients show prolonged saccadic latencies, increased antisaccade error rates, reduced smooth pursuit gain, and fixation instability. Such deficits correlate with cognitive impairment, disease severity, and neuroimaging biomarkers of cortical atrophy. Comparisons with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) highlight overlapping yet distinct oculomotor profiles, suggesting diagnostic and prognostic value. Eye-tracking methodologies offer non-invasive, cost-effective tools that could complement neuropsychological and imaging assessments. However, methodological variability remains a barrier to clinical implementation. This review integrates evidence from foundational and recent studies to provide a comprehensive account of oculomotor dysfunction in AD and other dementias, emphasizing the translational potential of eye movement biomarkers in clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’sdementiaeye movementssaccadessmooth pursuitsquare-wave jerks

Identifiers

PMID41472887
PMCPMC12745221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.