Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472883›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

A computational framework to dissect imputation strategies for single-cell histone modification data.

Marta Moreno-González, Jeroen de Ridder, Jop Kind, Robin H van der Weide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta Moreno-GonzálezOncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-4929-104X
Jeroen de RidderOncode Institute, Center for Molecular Medicine, UMC Utrecht, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0828-3477
Jop KindOncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7538-2638
Robin H van der WeideOncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6466-7280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell profiling of histone post-translational modifications (scHPTMs) offers a powerful lens for dissecting epigenetic regulation and cellular identity, yet low read depth and inherent noise in these datasets pose significant analytical challenges. Here, we introduce the first comprehensive computational framework that systematically evaluates imputation strategies on scHPTM data, including methods originally developed for scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq. Leveraging both synthetic and published datasets, we apply novel performance metrics-implemented in a modular R package-to assess signal recovery, enrichment at biologically relevant genomic sites, and preservation of cell-to-cell similarities. Our extensive benchmarking reveals that performance varies markedly by analytical task (e.g. signal denoising, peak detection, and clustering), highlighting that no one-size-fits-all solution exists for these data. By delineating the strengths and limitations of current imputation approaches, this work lays the foundation for the targeted development of next-generation, task-aware algorithms, while providing critical guidance for researchers and developers on the current capabilities and unmet needs in single-cell epigenomics.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyHistone CodeHistonesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsHumansSoftwareHistones

Identifiers

PMID41472883
PMCPMC12746105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.