ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
A computational framework to dissect imputation strategies for single-cell histone modification data.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell profiling of histone post-translational modifications (scHPTMs) offers a powerful lens for dissecting epigenetic regulation and cellular identity, yet low read depth and inherent noise in these datasets pose significant analytical challenges. Here, we introduce the first comprehensive computational framework that systematically evaluates imputation strategies on scHPTM data, including methods originally developed for scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq. Leveraging both synthetic and published datasets, we apply novel performance metrics-implemented in a modular R package-to assess signal recovery, enrichment at biologically relevant genomic sites, and preservation of cell-to-cell similarities. Our extensive benchmarking reveals that performance varies markedly by analytical task (e.g. signal denoising, peak detection, and clustering), highlighting that no one-size-fits-all solution exists for these data. By delineating the strengths and limitations of current imputation approaches, this work lays the foundation for the targeted development of next-generation, task-aware algorithms, while providing critical guidance for researchers and developers on the current capabilities and unmet needs in single-cell epigenomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.