Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472857›Full record

ArticleiMeta2025

A comprehensive benchmarking for spatially resolved transcriptomics clustering methods across variable technologies, organs, and replicates.

Renjie Chen, Yue Yao, Jingyang Qian, Xin Peng, Xin Shao, Xiaohui Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iMeta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renjie ChenPharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.
Yue YaoPharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.
Jingyang QianPharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.
Xin PengNingbo Municipal Hospital of TCM Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Ningbo China.
Xin ShaoPharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1928-3878
Xiaohui FanPharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-3007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial clustering is a critical step in the analysis of spatially resolved transcriptomics, serving as the foundation for downstream investigation of tissue heterogeneity. Although numerous computational tools have been developed, systematic benchmarking across different technologies, organs, and biological replicates has been limited. Here, we present a comprehensive evaluation of 14 spatial clustering methods using approximately 600 datasets, including both real-world and simulated data with ground truth. We evaluated accuracy and applicability across diverse technologies and organs, revealing method-specific strengths and preferences. Using simulation of adjacent tissue slices and spatial neighborhood disruptions, we further examined performance in the context of biological replicates. Furthermore, we investigated how data characteristics, spatial distribution patterns, and preprocessing pipelines influence clustering outcomes. Together, our results provide practical benchmarking guidance, enabling researchers to select appropriate spatial clustering methods tailored to specific technologies, organs, and biological replicates.

Indexed as

benchmarking analysispreprocessing pipelinespatial clusteringspatially resolved transcriptomicssystematic comparison

Identifiers

PMID41472857
PMCPMC12747554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.