ArticleiMeta2025
The interplay between tissue-resident microbiome and host proteins by integrated multi-omics during progression of colorectal adenoma to carcinoma.
Article in iMeta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- NICD3 mediates pro-angiogenic effects through SMAD3/TGFBI axis in colorectal cancer.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota characteristics of gastric cancer patients across distinct pathological stages and their associations with tumor and paratumor mucosal microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The gut microbiome in colorectal cancer: molecular paradigms and translational frontiers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- The intratumoral microbiome in colorectal cancer: origins, microenvironmental interactions, and new horizons in precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Colorectal cancer-derived extracellular vesicles: at the crossroads of the tumor microenvironment and gut microbiota.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intratumoral microbiome is an emerging hallmark of cancer, yet its multi-kingdom host-microbiome ecosystem in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains poorly characterized. Here, we conducted an integrated analysis using deep shotgun metagenomics and proteomics on 185 tissue samples, including adenoma (A), paired tumor (T), and para-tumor (P). We identified 4057 bacterial, 61 fungal, 108 archaeal, and 374 viral species in tissues and revealed distinct intratumor microbiota dysbiosis, indicating a CRC-specific multi-kingdom microbial ecosystem. Proteomic profiling uncovered four CRC subtypes (C1-C4), each with unique clinical prognoses and molecular signatures. We further discovered that host-microbiome interactions are dynamically reorganized during carcinogenesis, where different microbial taxa converge on common host pathways through distinct proteins. Leveraging this interplay, we identified 14 multi-kingdom microbial and 8 protein markers that strongly distinguished A from T samples (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 0.962), with external validation in two independent datasets (AUROC = 0.920 and 0.735). Moreover, we constructed an early- versus advanced-stage classifier using 8 microbial and 4 protein markers, which demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (AUROC = 0.926) and was validated externally (AUROC = 0.659-0.744). Functional validation in patient-derived organoids and murine allograft models confirmed that enterotoxigenic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.