Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472840›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2025

Use of oXiris

David Ballesteros, Andrea Cristina Mantilla Villarreal, Sandra Cecilia Narváez Martínez, Isabel Saravia, Susan Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David BallesterosNephrology Service, University Hospital San José, University of Cauca, Popayán, Colombia.
Andrea Cristina Mantilla VillarrealNephrology Service, University Hospital San José, University of Cauca, Popayán, Colombia.
Sandra Cecilia Narváez MartínezNephrology Service, University Hospital San José, University of Cauca, Popayán, Colombia.
Isabel SaraviaMedical Department, Vantive, Bogotá, Colombia.
Susan MartínezEpidemiology Department, EpiThinK Health Consulting, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Septic shock with acute kidney injury (AKI) carries high mortality in resource-limited settings. The oXiris Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort of adults with septic shock and KDIGO stage 2-3 AKI treated with CRRT using oXiris Results: Fifty patients were analyzed (median age 56.5 [IQR 46.0-66.0] years; 32% male); 21 (42%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Norepinephrine requirements fell from 0.303 to 0.000 µg/kg/min over 72 hours (p<0.001), and vasopressin use declined to zero (p<0.001), while mean arterial pressure increased from 74.5 to 83.0 mmHg. In-hospital mortality was 62% (31/50) and was higher in patients with greater baseline severity (APACHE II 21.5 vs 14.5 in survivors; p=0.023). ICU length of stay was 14.0 days [5.0-22.5] and was longer in survivors than non-survivors (21.0 vs 8.0 days; p<0.001). Among survivors, 63% (12/19) were dialysis-independent at discharge. COVID-19 septic shock was associated with higher crude mortality (76% vs 52%) and lower renal recovery among survivors (9.5% vs 34%) compared with non-COVID sepsis. Conclusions: In a resource-limited ICU, oXiris

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryCOVID-19developing countrieshemoperfusionhospital mortalityrenal replacement therapyseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID41472840
PMCPMC12745276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.