ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2025
Spatial coherence in DNA barcode networks.
Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational protocol to assess the quality of sequencing-based microscopy networks using spatial coherence metrics.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Hidden network preserved in Slide-tags data allows reference-free spatial reconstruction.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA barcode networks are the basis of sequencing-based microscopy, an emerging family of chemical imaging methods aiming to reconstruct spatial information, without optics, using sequencing technology. These methods capture microscopic spatial information by forming networks composed of many local chemical interactions, each marked by a unique, DNA-based barcode. However, the fundamental laws governing such networks are not yet understood, and spatial barcode networks are influenced by structural distortions such as false or shortcut edges. Current methods lack ground-truth-free tools to validate spatial quality, and we address this with a framework for topology-based quality control. We define a fundamental feature of spatial networks, spatial coherence, which quantifies geometric self-consistency in a network. By formalizing this relationship into quantitative metrics adapted from classical geometric rules, we could quantify spatial distortions by using only network data and show how these can be used as an optimization criterion to iteratively improve spatial reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.