Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472825›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2025

Neural mechanisms of visual quality perception and adaptability in the visual pathway.

Yiming Zhang, Yitong Chen, Ying Hu, Xu Han, Zhenhui Xie, Xingrui Wang, Yan Zhou, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yiming ZhangInstitute of Image Communication and Network Engineering, Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yitong ChenInstitute of Image Communication and Network Engineering, Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ying HuDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xu HanDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenhui XieDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xingrui WangDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiongkuo MinInstitute of Image Communication and Network Engineering, Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Guangtao ZhaiInstitute of Image Communication and Network Engineering, Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual quality assessment (VQA) is indispensable in multimedia for evaluating algorithm effectiveness and optimizing systems, yet its neurobiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigate how the brain processes varying image qualities, revealing specialized mechanisms for handling low-quality stimuli. Results show that low quality significantly impacts semantic encoding along the visual pathway: low-level regions exhibit only 35.20% of the semantic information seen in high-quality condition, while higher-level regions compensate adaptively to maintain understanding. Visual quality is not locally encoded but emerges from inter-regional information gaps, with perception arising from this hierarchical discrepancy. Leveraging this compensatory mechanism, we decode quality from fMRI and propose a neural network feature fusion strategy, boosting ResNet's VQA performance by 14.29% on the BID dataset (586 instances). Our findings provide neurobiological evidence for degraded visual processing, addressing a gap in perception neuroscience and offering theoretical foundations for improving VQA models.

Indexed as

brain mechanismsfMRIvisual perceptionvisual quality assessment

Identifiers

PMID41472825
PMCPMC12745989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.