ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2025
Cortical response to proprioceptive stimulation in primary orthostatic tremor - a magnetoencephalography study.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Patients with primary orthostatic tremor (OT) are affected by a strong feeling of instability. Our aim was to investigate whether cortical response to proprioceptive information is altered in OT compared with healthy control subjects (HC) using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Methods: Fifteen OT patients and 15 HCs were examined using whole-head MEG. Proprioceptive stimulation was evoked by passive movements of the right index finger and right foot. Time-frequency responses were extracted in the frequency range of 8-30 Hz. The MEG sensor with the highest amplitude change time-locked to the proprioceptive stimulus was used to calculate the amplitude of event-related desynchronization (ERD) and subsequent event-related re-synchronization (ERS). Results: Finger stimulation induced reliable ERD and ERS, as expected, in both OT patients and HC. Foot stimulation induced weaker ERS in both groups. Cluster-based permutation tests did not reveal any significant differences between the OT and HC groups. Discussion: We did not find evidence supporting a generally altered cortical response to proprioceptive stimulation in patients with OT. Significance: This is the first study on proprioceptive cortical processing in OT. The results do not support the interpretation that the characteristic intense feeling of instability in OT is linked to altered cortical response to proprioceptive information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.