Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472548›Full record

Trial reportJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2026

Combined intravenous bolus amino acid supplementation and mobilization on early muscle loss in critically ill adults: A randomized controlled trial.

Lizl Veldsman, Guy A Richards, Daniel Nel, Tertius A Kohn, Renée Blaauw

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Timing-specific neutrality in a rigorous ICU anabolic trial.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Reply to: Timing-specific neutrality in a Rigorous ICU anabolic trial.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lizl VeldsmanDepartment of Global Health, Division of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1613-6071
Guy A RichardsDepartment of Surgery, Division of Critical Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8893-3934
Daniel NelDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Centre for Statistical Consultation, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Tertius A KohnDepartment of Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-6319
Renée BlaauwDepartment of Global Health, Division of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-5918

Funding

JumpStart Program by Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle wasting is a hallmark of critical illness. We evaluated the effect of amino acid supplementation and mobilization on early muscle loss in critically ill patients.

methodsWe conducted a randomized parallel-group trial involving adult patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups, both receiving standard care nutrition and mobilization. The intervention group also received a daily intravenous amino acid bolus with 45 min of cycle ergometry, starting on days 3-4 for a mean of 6 days. The primary co-outcomes were changes in vastus lateralis myofiber cross-sectional area (from biopsies) and ultrasound-derived rectus femoris cross-sectional area, measured between the preintervention (day 2) and postintervention (day 8) time points. Analyses were conducted using mixed-model analysis of variance and least significant difference testing. Secondary outcomes included the protein-to-DNA ratio, muscle echogenicity, whole-body phase angle, muscle strength (Medical Research Council sum score) and physical capability (6-min walk test).

resultsFifty patients (90% male, age 37 ± 12 years) were included. Standard of care participants received 1.23 ± 0.18 g/kg/day protein; intervention participants 1.57 ± 0.27 g/kg/day, including 0.37 ± 0.05 g/kg/day from the supplement. Muscle loss occurred significantly over time (biopsy P = 0.01; ultrasound P < 0.001), with no significant differences between groups. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in protein-to-DNA ratio, muscle echogenicity, phase angle, muscle strength, or physical capability.

conclusionA short-duration combined intervention of intravenous bolus amino acids and cycle ergometry, limited to the acute phase of critical illness, did not reduce muscle loss or improve muscle quality, strength, or physical capability.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsCritical IllnessDietary SupplementsEarly AmbulationMuscular AtrophyAdultFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthQuadriceps MuscleAmino Acidsamino acidscritical illnessmobilizationmuscle massrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41472548
PMCPMC12865756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.