Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41472324›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

AlphaFold-RandomWalk and AlphaFold-Ensemble: Sampling Alternative Protein Conformations with Perturbed Versions of AlphaFold.

Ishan Taneja, Manuel A Llanos, Monica L Fernández-Quintero, Johannes R Loeffler, Matthew Holcomb, Andrew B Ward, Stefano Forli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ishan TanejaDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-3498
Manuel A LlanosDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Monica L Fernández-QuinteroDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6811-6283
Johannes R LoefflerDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Matthew HolcombDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8409-4344
Andrew B WardDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Stefano ForliDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5964-7111

Funding

AutoDock Suite: Next Generation Environment for Drug DesignR01GM069832 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI FORLI, STEFANO · 2004 to 2025
$10.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of proteins to adopt multiple conformations is fundamental to their biological function. With the advent of AlphaFold, machine learning (ML)-based methods have extended their capabilities to more broadly sample this intrinsic conformational diversity. However, the extent to which ML approaches can independently generate ensembles of diverse and biologically relevant conformations remains an open question. We sought to tackle this challenge by developing AlphaFold-RandomWalk (AF-RW) and AlphaFold-Ensemble (AF-Ensemble), novel ML-based methods to generate diverse protein conformations. As opposed to traditional approaches which rely on modifying the input multiple sequence alignment, AF-RW systematically adds noise to the weights of the model on a per-target basis, significantly increasing the conformational diversity of predicted models compared to conventional methods. AF-Ensemble takes the complementary approach fine-tuning an ensemble of models to produce diversity from a set of two-state systems. Additionally, both methods were incorporated into an automated, multistage computational pipeline that seeds unbiased molecular dynamics simulations from ML-generated conformations to efficiently sample alternative conformations. When evaluated on a diverse set of ten proteins, our pipeline provided useful, MD-guided hypotheses for determining biologically meaningful alternative conformations. Moreover, simulations seeded from diverse ML-generated conformations provided a reasonable approximation to the free energy landscape of two challenging protein targets, K-Ras and ribose-binding protein. Overall, our work highlights the potential of combining diverse conformations generated by perturbing the weights of AF with molecular dynamics simulations to efficiently probe protein conformational heterogeneity.

Indexed as

ProteinsMachine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteins

Identifiers

PMID41472324
PMCPMC13183293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.