Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471894›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

Recycling of Undigested Proteins Provided by the Host to the Large Intestine Microbiota: Implication for Intestinal Bacterial Anabolism, Growth, and Physiology.

François Blachier, Xiangfeng Kong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

François BlachierUMR PNCA, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, INRAe, 91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-0990
Xiangfeng KongInstitute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8034-6682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the digestion of dietary and endogenous proteins by the exocrine pancreatic proteases and peptidases in the small intestine luminal fluid is highly efficient for most proteins, it has been roughly approximated that between 3 and 11 g of alimentary proteins and peptides are moving from the small intestine to the large intestine in humans. Here, this nitrogenous material is degraded by the bacterial protease and peptidase activities, releasing amino acids. These amino acids are utilized by the abundant population of bacteria, notably amino acids that the bacteria are unable to synthesize, and which can thus be considered as indispensable for these microorganisms. The anabolism of amino acids by colonic bacteria is related to the synthesis of proteins while some specific amino acids are used for the synthesis of the purine and pyrimidine rings in DNA and RNA. Catabolism of specific amino acids allows for ATP synthesis and results in the production of metabolites with documented roles in the metabolism and physiology of commensal and pathogenic microorganisms among the intestinal microbiota. In the present narrative review, we examine the recycling of the undigested host's proteins by large intestine bacteria and the metabolism of released amino acids. In addition, we describe how these metabolic pathways are involved in bacterial growth and communication, as well as in bacterial physiology in terms of virulence, resistance to detrimental environmental conditions, and capacity to form biofilms.

Indexed as

amino acid-derived bacterial metabolitesbacterial communicationbacterial metabolismbacterial physiologylarge intestine microbiotaundigested proteins

Identifiers

PMID41471894
PMCPMC12735062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.