ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancing Aquatic Ecotoxicology Testing of Anticancer Drugs Through Mesocosms.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread use of anticancer drugs (ACDs) in human therapies determines the occurrence of these potent cytotoxic chemicals into aquatic ecosystems. Nowadays, ACDs are ubiquitous contaminants in wastewater effluents and freshwater compartments, raising urgent questions about their environmental impact. Designed to disrupt cellular proliferation, these compounds are inherently bioactive and can exert toxic effects on non-target organisms even at trace concentrations. Conventional fate and toxicity tests provide important initial data but are limited in ecological realism, often focusing on single-specie and single-endpoint under controlled conditions and overlooking complex interactions, trophic dynamics, and long-term chronic exposures. Knowledge of all these aspects is needed for proper monitoring, assessment, and regulation of ACDs. Simulated ecosystem experiments, such as mesocosms, provide intermediate-scale, semi-controlled platforms for investigating real-world exposure scenarios, assessing ACD fate, and identifying both direct and indirect ecological effects. They offer distinct advantages for evaluating the chronic toxicity of persistent pollutants by enabling realistic long-term contamination simulations and supporting the simultaneous collection of comprehensive hazard and exposure endpoints. This perspective underscores the growing concern surrounding the contamination of ACDs, examines the limitations of traditional assessment approaches, and advocates for mesocosm-based studies as a critical bridge between laboratory research and ecosystem-level understanding. By integrating mesocosm experiments into environmental fate and risk evaluation, we can better predict the behavior and ecological consequences of anticancer pharmaceuticals, guiding strategies to mitigate their impact on aquatic life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.