ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimal Low-Cost MEMS INS/GNSS Integrated Georeferencing Solution for LiDAR Mobile Mapping Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mobile mapping systems using LiDAR technology are becoming a reliable surveying technique to generate accurate point clouds. Mobile mapping systems integrate several advanced surveying technologies. This research investigated the development of a low-cost, accurate Microelectromechanical System (MEMS)-based INS/GNSS georeferencing system for LiDAR mobile mapping applications, enabling the generation of accurate point clouds. The challenge of using the MEMS IMU is that it is contaminated by high levels of noise and bias instability. To overcome this issue, new denoising and filtering methods were developed using a wavelet neural network (WNN) and an optimal maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) method to achieve an accurate MEMS-based INS/GNSS integration navigation solution for LiDAR mobile mapping applications. Moreover, the final accuracy of the MEMS-based INS/GNSS navigation solution was compared with the ASPRS standards for geospatial data production. It was found that the proposed WNN denoising method improved the MEMS-based INS/GNSS integration accuracy by approximately 11%, and that the optimal MLE method achieved approximately 12% higher accuracy than the forward-only navigation solution without GNSS outages. The proposed WNN denoising outperforms the current state-of-the-art Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), or LSTM-RNN, denoising model. Additionally, it was found that, depending on the sensor-object distance, the accuracy of the optimal MLE-based MEMS INS/GNSS navigation solution with WNN denoising ranged from 1 to 3 cm for ground mapping and from 1 to 9 cm for building mapping, which can fulfill the ASPRS standards of classes 1 to 3 and classes 1 to 9 for ground and building mapping cases, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.