ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Value of Robotics: Comparison of Three Different High-Intensity Training Programs for Rehabilitation After Stroke.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Strokes are one of the leading causes of adult disability. There are a wide range of therapies available in stroke care for people with stroke, but there can be wide variations in the effectiveness of these therapies, so it is essential to review and compare them from time to time. In our study, we measured and compared the effectiveness of three high-intensity therapies: an agility training program without technological tools, a virtual reality exergaming training program with a low-cost device, and a high-cost robotic training program using augmented and virtual reality. All three therapies helped to improve the patients' functional abilities, balance, and gait. On average, endurance increased by 104-177%, balance scores by 36-53%, and gait speed by 5-10% depending on the intervention. Robotic therapy and exergaming facilitate greater improvements in walking speed, step length, and balance-related gait metrics. These findings have profound implications for stroke rehabilitation, advocating for the prioritization of robotic and exergaming interventions over conventional functional therapies, like agility training. Given the limited sample size, the results should be interpreted as preliminary, highlighting the need for further studies with larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.