Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471654›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Impact of Quantifying Human Locomotor Activity on Examining Sleep-Wake Cycles.

Bálint Maczák, Adél Zita Hordós, Gergely Vadai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bálint MaczákDepartment of Technical Informatics, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1867-5861
Adél Zita HordósDepartment of Technical Informatics, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Gergely VadaiDepartment of Technical Informatics, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2720-3380

Funding

University of Szeged Open Access Fund 8225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actigraphy quantifies human locomotor activity by measuring wrist acceleration via wearable devices at relatively high rates and converting it into lower-temporal-resolution activity values; however, the computational implementations of this data compression differ substantially across manufacturers. Building on our previous work comparing activity determination methods, we have investigated how they (e.g., digital filtering and data compression) influence nonparametric circadian rhythm analysis and sleep-wake scoring. In addition to our generalized actigraphic framework, we have also emulated the use of specific devices commonly employed in such sleep-related studies by applying their methods to raw actigraphic acceleration data we collected to demonstrate, through concrete real-life examples, how methodological choices may shape analytical outcomes. Additionally, we assessed whether nonparametric indicators could be derived directly from acceleration data without compressing them into activity values. Overall, our analysis revealed that all these analytical approaches to the sleep-wake cycle can be substantially affected by the manufacturer-dependent actigraphic methodology employed, with the observed effects traceable to distinct steps of the signal-processing pipeline, underscoring the necessity of cross-manufacturer harmonization from a clinically oriented perspective.

Indexed as

ActigraphyCircadian RhythmLocomotionSleepWakefulnessAdultFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWearable Electronic Devicesactigraphycircadian rhythmhuman locomotor activitysleep–wake cycle

Identifiers

PMID41471654
PMCPMC12737032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.