ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantitative Assessment of Biomechanical Deviations in Hybrid III Dummy Response Caused by Accessory Lumbar Supports.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multi-Sensor Experimental Framework for Assessing Occupant and Vehicle Dynamics in Crash Test Scenarios.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Rear-end collisions remain a significant category of road accidents, despite widespread passive safety systems. Although modern seats are designed to reduce injury risk, the influence of accessory lumbar supports on passenger safety is still insufficiently investigated. This study analyzes the biomechanical response of a Hybrid III 50th percentile dummy on a vehicle seat fitted with various lumbar support types, compared to a reference configuration. Tests were conducted on a sled bench, simulating impacts of varying energy using crash pulses of 10 g, 15 g, and 20 g, for each tested lumbar support configuration in carefully controlled laboratory conditions. A key element of the procedure was analyzing changes in head and chest acceleration waveforms relative to results obtained for the reference seat. To quantitatively assess discrepancies between signals, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and the CORA (CORrelation and Analysis) objective rating method were applied. These tools enabled precise separation of amplitude changes from phase shifts arising from different system dynamics. The results show that additional equipment elements modify dummy-seat interaction, with the extent of biomechanical response changes also depending on crash pulse value. This indicates that ergonomic supports are not biomechanically neutral and should be considered in comprehensive safety analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.