ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Forecasting Energy Demand in Quicklime Manufacturing: A Data-Driven Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Reinforcement Learning-Based Framework for Tariff-Aware Load Shifting in Energy-Intensive Manufacturing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a deep learning-based framework for forecasting energy demand in a quicklime production company, aiming to enhance operational efficiency and enable data-driven decision-making for industrial scalability. Using one year of real electricity consumption data, the methodology integrates temporal and operational variables-such as load profile, active power, shift indicators, and production-related proxies-to capture the dynamics of energy usage throughout the manufacturing process. Several neural network architectures, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Conv1D models, were trained and compared to predict short-term power demand with 10-min resolution. Among these, the GRU model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with a best performance of RMSE = 2.18 kW, MAE = 0.49 kW, and SMAPE = 3.64% on the test set. The resulting forecasts support cost-efficient scheduling under time-of-use tariffs and provide valuable insights for infrastructure planning, capacity management, and sustainability optimization in energy-intensive industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.