ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Wi-Fi/PDR Fusion Localization Method Based on Genetic Algorithm Global Optimization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In indoor environments, fusion localization methods that combine Wi-Fi fingerprinting and Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (PDR) are constrained by the high sensitivity of traditional filters, such as the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), to initial states and by their susceptibility to nonlinear drift. This study presents a Wi-Fi/PDR fusion localization approach based on global geometric alignment optimized via a Genetic Algorithm (GA). The proposed method models the PDR trajectory as an integrated geometric entity and performs a global search for the optimal two-dimensional similarity transformation that aligns it with discrete Wi-Fi observations, thereby eliminating dependence on precise initial conditions and mitigating multipath noise. Experiments conducted in a real office environment (14 × 9 m, eight dual-band APs) with a double-L trajectory demonstrate that the proposed GA fusion achieves the lowest mean error of 0.878 m (compared to 2.890 m, 1.277 m, and 1.193 m for Wi-Fi, PDR, and EKF fusion, respectively) and an RMSE of 0.978 m. It also attains the best trajectory fidelity (DTW = 0.390 m, improving by 71.0%, 14.7%, and 27.8%) and the smallest maximum deviation (Hausdorff = 1.904 m, 52.4% lower than Wi-Fi). The cumulative error distribution shows that 90% of GA fusion errors are within 1.5 m, outperforming EKF and PDR. Additional experiments that compare the proposed GA optimizer with Levenberg-Marquardt (LM), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and Procrustes alignment, as well as tests with 30% artificial Wi-Fi outliers, further confirm the robustness of the Huber-based cost and the effectiveness of the global optimization framework. These results indicate that the proposed GA-based fusion method achieves high robustness and accuracy in the tested office-scale scenario and demonstrate its potential as a practical multi-sensor fusion approach for indoor localization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.