ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
IoT Authentication in Federated Learning: Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application Progress of Machine Learning in Prognostic Prediction of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) has established an exceptional ecosystem of interconnected devices where a vast multitude of heterogeneous devices can communicate, collect, and share data for enhanced decision-making processes. To effectively analyze this immense volume of data, researchers have deployed advanced machine learning algorithms and deep neural networks. However, these approaches typically rely on centralized data storage for training, which raises significant privacy concerns. Federated Learning (FL) addresses this issue by allowing devices to train local models on their own data and share only model updates. Despite this advantage, FL remains vulnerable to several security threats, including model poisoning, data manipulation, and Byzantine attacks. Therefore, robust and scalable authentication mechanisms are essential to ensure secure participation in FL environments. This study provides a comprehensive survey of authentication in FL. We examine the authentication process, discuss the associated key challenges, and analyze architectural considerations relevant to securing FL deployments. Existing authentication schemes are reviewed and evaluated in terms of their effectiveness, limitations, and practicality. To provide deeper insight, we classify these schemes along two dimensions as follows: their underlying enabling technologies, such as blockchain, cryptography, and AI-based methods, and the system contexts in which FL operates. Furthermore, we analyze the datasets and experimental environments used in current research, identify open research challenges, and highlight future research directions. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the first structured and comprehensive analysis of authentication mechanisms in FL, offering a foundational reference for advancing secure and trustworthy federated learning systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.