ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
On a Hybrid CNN-Driven Pipeline for 3D Defect Localisation in the Inspection of EV Battery Modules.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reliability of electric vehicle (EV) batteries requires detecting surface defects but also precisely locating them on the physical module for automated inspection, repair, and process optimisation. Conventional 2D computer vision methods, though accurate in image-space, do not provide traceable, real-world defect coordinates on complex or curved battery surfaces, limiting utility for digital twins, root cause analysis, and automated quality control. This work proposes a hybrid inspection pipeline that produces millimetre-level three-dimensional (3D) defect maps for EV battery modules. The approach integrates (i) calibrated dual-view multi-view geometry to project defect points onto the CAD geometry and triangulate them where dual-view coverage is available, (ii) single-image neural 3D shape inference calibrated to the module geometry to complement regions with limited multi-view coverage, and (iii) generative, physically informed augmentation of rare or complex defect types. Defects are first detected in 2D images using a convolutional neural network (CNN), then projected onto a dense 3D CAD model of each module, complemented by a single-image depth prediction in regions with limited dual-view coverage, yielding true as-built localisation on the battery's surface. GenAI methods are employed to expand the dataset with synthetic defect variations. Synthetic, physically informed defect examples are incorporated during training to mitigate the scarcity of rare defect types. Evaluation on a pilot industrial dataset, with a physically measured reference subset, demonstrates that the hybrid 3D approach achieves millimetre-scale localisation accuracy and outperforms a per-view CNN baseline in both segmentation and 3D continuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.