ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Document Classification Through Multimodal Image-Text Classification: Insights from Fine-Tuned CLIP and Multimodal Deep Fusion.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foundation models excel on general benchmarks but often underperform in clinical settings due to domain shift between internet-scale pretraining data and medical data. Multimodal deep learning, which jointly leverages medical images and clinical text, is promising for diagnosis, yet it remains unclear whether domain adaptation is better achieved by fine-tuning large vision-language models or by training lighter, task-specific architectures. We address this question by introducing PairDx, a balanced dataset of 22,665 image-caption pairs spanning six medical document classes, curated to reduce class imbalance and support fair, reproducible comparisons. Using PairDx, we develop and evaluate two approaches: (i) PairDxCLIP, a fine-tuned CLIP (ViT-B/32), and (ii) PairDxFusion, a custom hybrid model that combines ResNet-18 visual features and GloVe text embeddings with attention-based fusion. Both adapted models substantially outperform a zero-shot CLIP baseline (61.18% accuracy) and a specialized model, BiomedCLIP, which serves as an additional baseline and achieves 66.3% accuracy. Our fine-tuned CLIP (PairDxCLIP) attains 93% accuracy and our custom fusion model (PairDxFusion) reaches 94% accuracy on a held-out test set. Notably, PairDxFusion achieves this high accuracy with 17 min, 55 s of training time, nearly four times faster than PairDxCLIP (65 min, 52 s), highlighting a practical efficiency-performance trade-off for clinical deployment. The testing time also outperforms the specialized model-BiomedCLIP (0.387 s/image). Our results demonstrate that carefully constructed domain-specific datasets and lightweight multimodal fusion can close the domain gap while reducing computational cost in healthcare decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.