Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471557›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advancing Machine Learning Strategies for Power Consumption-Based IoT Botnet Detection.

Almustapha A Wakili, Saugat Guni, Sabbir Ahmed Khan, Wei Yu, Woosub Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Almustapha A WakiliDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5854-2227
Saugat GuniDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3909-2049
Sabbir Ahmed KhanDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.
Wei YuDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4522-7340
Woosub JungDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0278-6559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has amplified botnet risks, while traditional network-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs) struggle under encrypted and/or sparse traffic. Power consumption offers an effective side channel for device-level detection. Yet, prior studies typically focus on a single model family (often a convolutional neural network (CNN)) and rarely assess generalization across devices or compare broader model classes. In this paper, we conduct unified benchmarking and comparison of classical (SVM and RF), deep (CNN, LSTM, and 1D Transformer), and hybrid (CNN + LSTM, CNN + Transformer, and CNN + RF) models on the CHASE'19 dataset and a newly curated three-class botnet dataset, using consistent preprocessing and evaluation across single- and cross-device settings, reporting both accuracy and efficiency (latency and throughput). Experimental results demonstrate that Random Forest achieves the highest single-device accuracy (99.43% on the Voice Assistant with Seed 42), while CNN + Transformer shows a strong accuracy-efficiency trade-off in cross-device scenarios (94.02% accuracy on the combined dataset at ∼60,000 samples/s when using the best-performing Seed 42). These results offer practical guidance for selecting models under accuracy, latency, and throughput constraints and establish a reproducible baseline for power-side-channel IDSs.

Indexed as

botnet detectionCHASE’19 datasetdeep learninghybrid modelsInternet of Things (IoT)machine learningpower consumption

Identifiers

PMID41471557
PMCPMC12736941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.