ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Deep Learning for Tumor Segmentation and Multiclass Classification in Breast Ultrasound Images Using Pretrained Models.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of breast cancer commonly relies on imaging technologies such as ultrasound, mammography and MRI. Among these, breast ultrasound is widely used by radiologists to identify and assess lesions. In this study, we developed image segmentation techniques and multiclass classification artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on pretrained models to segment lesions and detect breast cancer. The proposed workflow includes both the development of segmentation models and development of a series of classification models to classify ultrasound images as normal, benign or malignant. The pretrained models were trained and evaluated on the Breast Ultrasound Images (BUSI) dataset, a publicly available collection of grayscale breast ultrasound images with corresponding expert-annotated masks. For segmentation, images and ground-truth masks were used to pretrained encoder (ResNet18, EfficientNet-B0 and MobileNetV2)-decoder (U-Net, U-Net++ and DeepLabV3) models, including the DeepLabV3 architecture integrated with a Frequency-Domain Feature Enhancement Module (FEM). The proposed FEM improves spatial and spectral feature representations using Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT), GroupNorm, dropout regularization and adaptive fusion. For classification, each image was assigned a label (normal, benign or malignant). Optuna, an open-source software framework, was used for hyperparameter optimization and for the testing of various pretrained models to determine the best encoder-decoder segmentation architecture. Five different pretrained models (ResNet18, DenseNet121, InceptionV3, MobielNetV3 and GoogleNet) were optimized for multiclass classification. DeepLabV3 outperformed other segmentation architectures, with consistent performance across training, validation and test images, with Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC, a metric describing the overlap between predicted and true lesion regions) values of 0.87, 0.80 and 0.83 on training, validation and test sets, respectively. ResNet18:DeepLabV3 achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) score of 0.78 during training, while ResNet18:U-Net++ achieved the best Dice coefficient (0.83) and IoU (0.71) and area under the curve (AUC, 0.91) scores on the test (unseen) dataset when compared to other models. However, the proposed Resnet18: FrequencyAwareDeepLabV3 (FADeepLabV3) achieved a DSC of 0.85 and an IoU of 0.72 on the test dataset, demonstrating improvements over standard DeepLabV3. Notably, the frequency-domain enhancement substantially improved the AUC from 0.90 to 0.98, indicating enhanced prediction confidence and clinical reliability. For classification, ResNet18 produced an F1 score-a measure combining precision and recall-of 0.95 and an accuracy of 0.90 on the training dataset, while InceptionV3 performed best on the test dataset, with an F1 score of 0.75 and accuracy of 0.83. We demonstrate a comprehensive approach to automate the segmentation and multiclass classification of breast cancer ultrasound images into benign, malignant or normal transfer learning models on an imbalanced ultrasound image dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.