ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
AI-Driven Motion Capture Data Recovery: A Comprehensive Review and Future Outlook.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive review of motion capture (MoCap) data recovery techniques, with a particular focus on the suitability of artificial intelligence (AI) for addressing missing or corrupted motion data. Existing approaches are classified into three categories: non-data-driven, data-driven (AI-based), and hybrid methods. Within the AI domain, frameworks such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), transformers, and graph neural networks (GNNs) demonstrate strong capabilities in modeling complex spatial-temporal dependencies and achieving accurate motion reconstruction. Compared with traditional methods, AI techniques offer greater adaptability and precision, though they remain limited by high computational costs and dependence on large, high-quality datasets. Hybrid approaches that combine AI models with physics-based or statistical algorithms provide a balance between efficiency, interpretability, and robustness. The review also examines benchmark datasets, including CMU MoCap and Human3.6M, while highlighting the growing role of synthetic and augmented data in improving AI model generalization. Despite notable progress, the absence of standardized evaluation protocols and diverse real-world datasets continues to hinder generalization. Emerging trends point toward real-time AI-driven recovery, multimodal data fusion, and unified performance benchmarks. By integrating traditional, AI-based, and hybrid approaches into a coherent taxonomy, this review provides a unique contribution to the literature. Unlike prior surveys focused on prediction, denoising, pose estimation, or generative modeling, it treats MoCap recovery as a standalone problem. It further synthesizes comparative insights across datasets, evaluation metrics, movement representations, and common failure cases, offering a comprehensive foundation for advancing MoCap recovery research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.