Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471496›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Data-Driven Phenotyping from Foot-Mounted IMU Waveforms: Elucidating Phenotype-Specific Fall Mechanisms.

Ryusei Sato, Takashi Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryusei SatoGraduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Miyagi, Japan.
Takashi WatanabeGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Miyagi, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23H03784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A one-size-fits-all approach to fall risk assessment in older adults has critical limitations. This study aimed to overcome this by identifying distinct gait phenotypes and their specific fall mechanisms using foot-mounted IMU waveform data from 146 older adults (mean age 82.6 ± 6.2 years). A data-driven clustering algorithm identified four phenotypes (Robust, High-cadence, Intermediate, and Cautious), each with different fall prevalence rates (27-68%). Interpretable machine learning (SHAP) revealed that fall trajectories were phenotype-dependent. While physiological declines such as gait speed were the primary cause of falls in the Cautious group, fear of falling (FES-I) was the primary cause in the physically healthy Robust group, suggesting a psychological pathway. Consequently, the optimal Timed Up and Go (TUG) test screening cutoff varied across phenotypes, ranging from 11.95 s to 14.00 s, demonstrating the limitations of a one-size-fits-all approach. These findings demonstrate that fall mechanisms are phenotype-dependent, underscoring the necessity of a personalized assessment strategy to improve fall prevention.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsFootGaitAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMalePhenotypedynamic time warpingfall riskgait phenotypinginertial sensortimed up and go test

Identifiers

PMID41471496
PMCPMC12737233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.