Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471490›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Outdoor Characterization and Geometry-Aware Error Modelling of an RGB-D Stereo Camera for Safety-Related Obstacle Detection.

Pierluigi Rossi, Elisa Cioccolo, Maurizio Cutini, Danilo Monarca, Daniele Puri, Davide Gattamelata, Leonardo Vita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pierluigi RossiDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-3153
Elisa CioccoloDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-3248
Maurizio CutiniCREA Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria (Research Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing), Via Milano 43, 24047 Treviglio, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6003-5382
Danilo MonarcaDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8980-3744
Daniele PuriDepartment of Technological Innovations and Safety of Plants, Products and Anthropic Settlements, Italian National Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work (INAIL), Via Roberto Ferruzzi 38/40, 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-9153-4063
Davide GattamelataDepartment of Technological Innovations and Safety of Plants, Products and Anthropic Settlements, Italian National Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work (INAIL), Via Roberto Ferruzzi 38/40, 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-2785
Leonardo VitaDepartment of Technological Innovations and Safety of Plants, Products and Anthropic Settlements, Italian National Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work (INAIL), Via Roberto Ferruzzi 38/40, 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8484-2827

Funding

Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro J83C23000020001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereo cameras, also known as depth cameras or RGB-D cameras, are increasingly employed in a large variety of machinery for obstacle detection purposes and navigation planning. This also represents an opportunity in agricultural machinery for safety purposes to detect the presence of workers on foot and avoid collisions. However, their outdoor performance at medium and long range under operational light conditions remains weakly quantified: the authors then fit a field protocol and a model to characterize the pipeline of stereo cameras, taking the Intel RealSense D455 as benchmark, across various distances from 4 m to 16 m in realistic farm settings. Tests have been conducted using a 1 square meter planar target in outdoor environments, under diverse illumination conditions and with the panel being located at 0°, 10°, 20° and 35° from the center of the camera's field of view (FoV). Built-in presets were also adjusted during tests, to generate a total of 128 samples. The authors then fit disparity surfaces to predict and correct systematic bias as a function of distance and radial FoV position, allowing them to compute mean depth and estimate a model of systematic error that takes depth bias as a function of distance, light conditions and FoV position. The results showed that the model can predict depth errors achieving a good degree of precision in every tested scenario (RMSE: 0.46-0.64 m, MAE: 0.40-0.51 m), enabling the possibility of replication and benchmarking on other sensors and field contexts while supporting safety-critical perception systems in agriculture.

Indexed as

agriculturedepth camerasobstacle detectionRGB-Dsafety

Identifiers

PMID41471490
PMCPMC12736762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.