ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Outdoor Characterization and Geometry-Aware Error Modelling of an RGB-D Stereo Camera for Safety-Related Obstacle Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stereo cameras, also known as depth cameras or RGB-D cameras, are increasingly employed in a large variety of machinery for obstacle detection purposes and navigation planning. This also represents an opportunity in agricultural machinery for safety purposes to detect the presence of workers on foot and avoid collisions. However, their outdoor performance at medium and long range under operational light conditions remains weakly quantified: the authors then fit a field protocol and a model to characterize the pipeline of stereo cameras, taking the Intel RealSense D455 as benchmark, across various distances from 4 m to 16 m in realistic farm settings. Tests have been conducted using a 1 square meter planar target in outdoor environments, under diverse illumination conditions and with the panel being located at 0°, 10°, 20° and 35° from the center of the camera's field of view (FoV). Built-in presets were also adjusted during tests, to generate a total of 128 samples. The authors then fit disparity surfaces to predict and correct systematic bias as a function of distance and radial FoV position, allowing them to compute mean depth and estimate a model of systematic error that takes depth bias as a function of distance, light conditions and FoV position. The results showed that the model can predict depth errors achieving a good degree of precision in every tested scenario (RMSE: 0.46-0.64 m, MAE: 0.40-0.51 m), enabling the possibility of replication and benchmarking on other sensors and field contexts while supporting safety-critical perception systems in agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.