Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471468›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Multi-Task Deep Learning for Surface Metrology.

Dawid Kucharski, Adam Gąska, Tomasz Kowaluk, Krzysztof Stępień, Marta Rępalska, Bartosz Gapiński, Michal Wieczorowski, Michal Nawotka, Piotr Sobecki, Piotr Sosinowski and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dawid KucharskiDivision of Metrology and Measurement Systems, Institute of Mechanical Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9880-9670
Adam GąskaLaboratory of Coordinate Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-864 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2178-3919
Tomasz KowalukInstitute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof StępieńDepartment of Metrology and Modern Manufacturing, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4955-5344
Marta RępalskaInstitute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland.
Bartosz GapińskiDivision of Metrology and Measurement Systems, Institute of Mechanical Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0206-1942
Michal WieczorowskiDivision of Metrology and Measurement Systems, Institute of Mechanical Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7526-8368
Michal NawotkaCentral Office of Measures, 00-139 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0009-5275-1379
Piotr SobeckiCentral Office of Measures, 00-139 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1752-2393
Piotr SosinowskiCentral Office of Measures, 00-139 Warsaw, Poland.
Jan TomasikInstitute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-525 Warsaw, Poland.
Adam WójtowiczCentral Office of Measures, 00-139 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1963-521X

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of Poland Polish Metrology II PM-II/SP/0104/2024/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A reproducible deep learning framework is presented for surface metrology to predict surface texture parameters together with their reported standard uncertainties. Using a multi-instrument dataset spanning tactile and optical systems, we jointly address measurement system type classification and regression of key surface parameters-arithmetic mean roughness (Ra), mean peak-to-valley roughness (Rz), and total roundness deviation (RONt)-alongside their reported standard uncertainties. Uncertainty is modelled via quantile and heteroscedastic regression heads, with post hoc conformal calibration used to obtain calibrated prediction intervals. On a held-out test set, high fidelity was achieved by single-target regressors (coefficients of determination: Ra 0.9824, Rz 0.9847, RONt 0.9918), with two uncertainty targets also well modelled (standard uncertainty of Ra 0.9899, standard uncertainty of Rz 0.9955); the standard uncertainty of RONt remained more difficult to learn (0.4934). The classifier reached 92.85% accuracy, and probability calibration was essentially unchanged after temperature scaling (expected calibration error 0.00504 → 0.00503 on the test split). Negative transfer was observed for naive multi-output trunks, with single-target models performing better. These results provide calibrated predictions suitable for informing instrument selection and acceptance decisions in metrological workflows.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconformal predictiondeep learningsurface metrologyuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID41471468
PMCPMC12736692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.