ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Vibrational Stress Analysis and Test Verification of Satellite Honeycomb Sandwich Plate Subjected to Acoustic Excitation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vibrational response and stress of satellites subjected to acoustic excitation are essential components to consider in the design process of large satellite constructions. To precisely forecast the vibrational response and stress subjected to acoustic excitation of a large satellite honeycomb sandwich plate, this article employs finite element modeling software to create a finite element model of satellite, equivalent honeycomb panels to orthotropic shear plates of identical stiffness and dimensions, and convert the acoustic excitation into random pressure on the surface of the flat plate, applying it to the surface of the satellite, then the vibration response and stress analysis subjected to acoustic excitation can be performed. The honeycomb structure collapsed after noise testing on a specific model of a large satellite, the aforementioned technique for response and stress validation was employed: the stress simulation analysis revealed that the maximum shear stress at the fracture site of the honeycomb panel was 0.45 MPa, exceeding the ultimate stress value of 0.44 MPa for the sparse honeycomb core at that location, leading to the collapse and fracture of the honeycomb panel. To resolve this matter, altering the honeycomb core design framework, a local dense honeycomb structure was implemented. The simulated shear stress of the honeycomb core is 0.54 MPa, which is below the stress limit of 2.43 MPa for the dense honeycomb core. To verify the feasibility of the plan, the noise test was conducted once again. Owing to the incapacity to test the shear stress of the honeycomb core, conducted strain testing on the surface of the honeycomb collapse and derive stress results by calculation, the test results deviate from the modeling values by 8.92%. And the maximum discrepancy between the simulated noise response and the experimental noise response is 0.58 g, validated the efficacy and precision of the simulation method, and successfully resolved the issue of damage to satellite honeycomb panels. This simulation method can precisely forecast the vibrational response and stress of satellites subjected to acoustic excitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.