Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471426›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Spatial and Temporal Field-Scale Accuracy Assessment of a Multi-Sensor Spade for In Situ Soil Diagnostics: Performance and Limitations of the Stenon FarmLab for Precision Agriculture.

Görres J Grenzdörffer, Jonas S Wienken, Alexander Steiger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Görres J GrenzdörfferDepartment for Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Faculty for Agriculture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-9554
Jonas S WienkenDepartment for Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Faculty for Agriculture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-6191-0538
Alexander SteigerDepartment for Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Faculty for Agriculture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-0582-4575

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) FKZ: 031B1098Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Consumer Protection Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany StALU WM-EIP-0001-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time, in situ soil diagnostics are increasingly relevant for precision agriculture, but their efficacy under varying field and climatic conditions remains underexplored. This study assesses the 2022/23 version of the Stenon FarmLab, a multi-sensor soil analysis tool, over a 10-month period and across 1187 measurements on six fields (five cropped, one grassland) in northeast Germany. Despite the common approach of comparing a field sensor against lab results, in this paper, the FarmLab's outputs are benchmarked using various approaches, such as time series, correlation, and geostatistical analysis, to fully evaluate the temporal and spatial stability and alignment with known soil heterogeneity. While physical soil parameters such as temperature and soil texture showed robust detection accuracy, key agronomic metrics-including mineral nitrogen (Nmin), soil organic carbon (SOC), and phosphorus-exhibited poor temporal consistency and low correlation with expected spatial patterns. Measurement errors and high sensitivity to weather conditions restrict data quality, particularly under frost and drought. Spatial clustering of more temporally stable parameters (e.g., pH, soil texture) allowed for limited zone delineation. We conclude that while the FarmLab shows partial potential for on-site soil sensing, significant limitations in nutrient measurement reliability currently prevent its use in operational precision agriculture. Enhancements in sensor calibration, environmental compensation, and software are needed for broader applicability.

Indexed as

in situ soil analysisnutrientsproximal soil sensingsensor reliabilitysoilspatial variabilityStenon FarmLab

Identifiers

PMID41471426
PMCPMC12737063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.