ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Spatial and Temporal Field-Scale Accuracy Assessment of a Multi-Sensor Spade for In Situ Soil Diagnostics: Performance and Limitations of the Stenon FarmLab for Precision Agriculture.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time, in situ soil diagnostics are increasingly relevant for precision agriculture, but their efficacy under varying field and climatic conditions remains underexplored. This study assesses the 2022/23 version of the Stenon FarmLab, a multi-sensor soil analysis tool, over a 10-month period and across 1187 measurements on six fields (five cropped, one grassland) in northeast Germany. Despite the common approach of comparing a field sensor against lab results, in this paper, the FarmLab's outputs are benchmarked using various approaches, such as time series, correlation, and geostatistical analysis, to fully evaluate the temporal and spatial stability and alignment with known soil heterogeneity. While physical soil parameters such as temperature and soil texture showed robust detection accuracy, key agronomic metrics-including mineral nitrogen (Nmin), soil organic carbon (SOC), and phosphorus-exhibited poor temporal consistency and low correlation with expected spatial patterns. Measurement errors and high sensitivity to weather conditions restrict data quality, particularly under frost and drought. Spatial clustering of more temporally stable parameters (e.g., pH, soil texture) allowed for limited zone delineation. We conclude that while the FarmLab shows partial potential for on-site soil sensing, significant limitations in nutrient measurement reliability currently prevent its use in operational precision agriculture. Enhancements in sensor calibration, environmental compensation, and software are needed for broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.