Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471423›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

From Wearable Sensor Networks to Markerless Motion Capture for Instrumental-Based Biomechanical Risk Assessment in Lifting Activities.

Irene Gennarelli, Tiwana Varrecchia, Giorgia Chini, Niki Martinel, Christian Micheloni, Alberto Ranavolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irene GennarelliDepartment of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Udine, Via Palladio 8, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-6665-6787
Tiwana VarrecchiaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL-National Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work, Via Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3910-2728
Giorgia ChiniDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL-National Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work, Via Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-0025
Niki MartinelDepartment of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Udine, Via Palladio 8, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6962-8643
Christian MicheloniDepartment of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Udine, Via Palladio 8, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4503-7483
Alberto RanavoloDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL-National Institute for Insurance Against Accidents at Work, Via Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-6166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual material handling is one of the leading causes of work-related low-back disorders, and an accurate assessment of the biomechanical risk is essential to support prevention strategies. Despite workers' interest in wearable sensor networks for quantifying exposure metrics, these systems still present several limitations, including potential interference with natural movements and workplaces, and concerns about durability and cost-effectiveness. For these reasons, alternative motion capture methods are being explored. Among them, completely markerless (ML) technologies are being increasingly applied in ergonomics. This study aimed to compare a wearable sensor network and an ML system in the evaluation of lifting tasks, focusing on the variables and multipliers used to compute the recommended weight limit (RWL) and the lifting index (LI) according to the revised NIOSH lifting equation. We hypothesized that ML systems equipped with multiple cameras may provide reliable and consistent estimations of these kinematic variables, thereby improving risk assessments. We also assumed that these ML approaches could represent valuable input for training AI algorithms capable of automatically classifying the biomechanical risk level. Twenty-eight workers performed standardized lifts under three risk conditions. The results showed significant differences between wearable sensor networks and ML systems for most measures, except at a low risk (LI = 1). Nevertheless, ML consistently showed a closer agreement with reference benchmarks and a lower variability. In terms of the automatic classification performance, ML-based kinematic variables yielded accuracy levels comparable to those obtained with the wearable system. These findings highlight the potential of ML approaches to deliver accurate, repeatable, and cost-effective biomechanical risk assessments, particularly in demanding lifting tasks.

Indexed as

LiftingWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaErgonomicsFemaleHumansMaleMotion CaptureRisk Assessmentbiomechanical risk assessmentmarkerless motion capturewearable sensor network

Identifiers

PMID41471423
PMCPMC12736423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.