ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Computational Simulation and Experimental Validation of Acoustic Reflectometry in Otitis Media.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Otitis Media (OM) is a prevalent condition in children that can lead to hearing impairment and significant healthcare costs. Inaccuracy in primary care and equipment cost in developing countries are concerning issues in OM diagnostics. Acoustic Reflectometry (AR) offers a low-cost, non-invasive diagnostic alternative, though it has fallen short on accuracy in previous studies. The primary aim of this study was to establish a computational simulation and an experimental model able to reproduce AR performed on human individuals to enable further research and accuracy improvement. The secondary aim was to perform a sensitivity analysis on AR instrument user error. Simulations and experiments were validated against measurements from human individuals with OM and normal ears, respectively. The results reveal that the simulation sufficiently reproduces human AR measurements and distinguishes an ear with OM from a healthy ear. The experiment delivered satisfying measurements on OM but underperformed in a normal ear scenario. The simulations and experiments overpredicted sound reflection in OM. The sensitivity study showed promising robustness of AR, concluding that computational simulation is a viable tool and complement to an experimental approach in research of AR. Future efforts should focus on paediatric models and partially filled middle ear simulations to promote clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.