Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471411›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Decision Support Systems in Neurosurgery: Current Applications and Future Directions.

Mateusz Koryciński, Konrad A Ciecierski, Ewa Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mateusz KorycińskiInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5239-1635
Konrad A CiecierskiInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2471-3016
Ewa Niewiadomska-SzynkiewiczInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4782-3816

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the fastest-developing research fields. Its methods are applied with great success to various problems across many industries. Healthcare is one of them, with AI applied to organizational problems, textual data analysis, and treatment decision support systems used for diagnosis and treatment. This paper reviews current AI methods in neurosurgery settings, discussing the potential use of decision support systems. As neurosurgery is highly technical and requires millimeter-precise guidance, AI systems can provide significant benefits in helping neurosurgeons navigate the surgical field. For example, AI-assisted neuronavigation during deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeries shortens the length of the procedure and significantly reduces the risk of electrode misplacement, and the need for future costly re-operation. We do not limit our review to existing methods, as we also discuss possible future directions for such systems. When developing such methods, special emphasis must be put on precision, usability, security, and explainability.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresArtificial IntelligenceDeep Brain StimulationHumansNeuronavigationartificial intelligencedata analysisdecision support systemsMRIneurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID41471411
PMCPMC12736516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.