ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bioengineering Stem Cell-Derived Glioblastoma Organoids: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exogenous matrix-free biomanufacturing of glioblastoma organoids enables autonomous assembly of neurovascular-like structures and extracellular matrix.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Modeling gliomas with organoids: reconstructing the human neural microenvironment for translational neuro-oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of novel therapeutics for deadly diseases such as glioblastoma (GBM) is bottlenecked by poor preclinical models. GBM is the most common and deadliest primary brain tumor in adults, with an average prognosis of 12-15 months, primarily due to its high cellular heterogeneity and treatment resistance from GBM stem cells. The advancement of in vitro models into organoids, three-dimensional tissue-like modeling systems, has been a promising approach to improving translational medicine for GBM. However, the critical tradeoff between technical convenience and physiological relevance threatens the integrity and reproducibility of GBM organoid (GBO) biomanufacturing. This comprehensive review breaks down and discusses the key features of GBM tumor microenvironment (TME), traces the advancement of in vitro models from two-dimensional cultures to three-dimensional stem cell-derived GBOs, evaluates the process through an engineering perspective (genetic, biochemical, biophysical, and process engineering), and addresses critical translational gaps. Reviewing trends over the last fifteen years in biomanufacturing approaches to GBOs revealed fundamental oversights that address previous review focuses on the limitations of organoids (i.e., maturity, vasculature, and immune defense). To summarize, GBO's translational gap and reproducibility challenges are rooted in the prioritization of technical convenience over physiological relevance. To achieve clinical relevance, future GBO development must focus on transitioning to fully defined components (excluding animal-derived ECM), developing sufficiently large-sized constructs to recapitulate the full TME, and integrating non-destructive and enhanced functional readouts of the GBOs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.