ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancing PROTAC Discovery Through Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Ternary Modeling to Predictive PROTAC Design: A Computational Perspective.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Induced proximity-based therapeutics for advanced prostate cancer.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- Pocket-PROTACs: an interpretable pocket-aware deep learning framework for predicting PROTAC-induced protein degradation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- FDA Approval of the First-Ever PROTAC: Vepdegestrant (ARV-471) Marks a New Era in Targeted Protein Degradation.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Understanding and Overcoming Antibody-Drug Conjugate Resistance: Biological Mechanisms and Emerging Analytical Frameworks in Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Computer-aided drug design in acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review of advances, challenges, and future prospect.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) represent a transformative modality in drug discovery, enabling the selective degradation of disease-relevant proteins through the ubiquitin proteasome system. Despite their therapeutic promise, the rational design of PROTACs remains a complex and resource-intensive process, involving multiple parameters such as target and ligase compatibility, ternary complex formation, linker optimization, and degradation efficiency. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have provided new strategies to address these obstacles, ranging from structure-based modeling of ternary complexes to degradability prediction, generative linker design, and pharmacokinetic property estimation. This review aims to explore how AI can be leveraged directly or indirectly in the PROTAC development pipeline. First, we analyze existing applications of AI, such as ternary complex structure prediction, degradability prediction, linker design, and ADME prediction. We further discuss how other approaches from the related fields may be adapted to address the challenges of PROTAC discovery. Lastly, we discuss challenges that current AI models face, such as limited data, poor interpretability, and low generalizability. Taken together, overcoming these barriers will enable AI-driven strategies to accelerate PROTAC discovery and provide a more rational framework for targeted protein degrader development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.