Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471282›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advancing PROTAC Discovery Through Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Kwang-Su Park, Minji Jeon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kwang-Su ParkCollege of Pharmacy, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea.
Minji JeonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02708, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5731-6186

Funding

Institute for Information communication Technology Planning and Evaluation IITP-2025-RS-2022-00156439National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00406114National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00441029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) represent a transformative modality in drug discovery, enabling the selective degradation of disease-relevant proteins through the ubiquitin proteasome system. Despite their therapeutic promise, the rational design of PROTACs remains a complex and resource-intensive process, involving multiple parameters such as target and ligase compatibility, ternary complex formation, linker optimization, and degradation efficiency. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have provided new strategies to address these obstacles, ranging from structure-based modeling of ternary complexes to degradability prediction, generative linker design, and pharmacokinetic property estimation. This review aims to explore how AI can be leveraged directly or indirectly in the PROTAC development pipeline. First, we analyze existing applications of AI, such as ternary complex structure prediction, degradability prediction, linker design, and ADME prediction. We further discuss how other approaches from the related fields may be adapted to address the challenges of PROTAC discovery. Lastly, we discuss challenges that current AI models face, such as limited data, poor interpretability, and low generalizability. Taken together, overcoming these barriers will enable AI-driven strategies to accelerate PROTAC discovery and provide a more rational framework for targeted protein degrader development.

Indexed as

ADME predictionAIdegradabilityPROTACPROTAC molecule designternary complex prediction

Identifiers

PMID41471282
PMCPMC12736115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.