ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Docking in the Dark: Insights into Protein-Protein and Protein-Ligand Blind Docking.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the flat screen: evaluating virtual reality as a complementary tool for molecular docking in drug discovery.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Identification of hypertension-associated bacterial key genes as potential targets and therapeutic agents through integrated bioinformatics approach.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- CB-Dock3: an enhanced web server for protein-ligand blind docking.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Exploring Mechanistic Targets ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Open-Source Molecular Docking and AI-Augmented Structure-Based Drug Design: Current Workflows, Challenges, and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Computational Strategies Reshaping Modern Drug Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blind docking predicts binding interactions between two molecular entities without prior knowledge of the binding site. This approach is essential because it explores the entire surface of the receptor to identify potential interaction sites. Blind docking widely works for both protein-protein and ligand-protein interaction studies. In protein-protein blind docking, the method aims to predict the correct orientation and interface of two proteins forming a complex. Protein blind docking is particularly valuable in studying transient interactions, protein-protein recognition, signaling pathways, tentative and significant biomolecular assemblies where structural data is limited. Ligand-protein blind docking discovers potential binding pockets across the entire protein surface. It is frequently applied in early-stage drug discovery, especially for novel or poorly characterized targets. The method helps identify allosteric sites or novel binding regions that are not evident from known structures. Overall, blind docking provides a versatile and powerful tool for studying molecular interactions, enabling discovery even in the absence of detailed structural information. In this scenario, we reported a timeline of attempts to improve this kind of computational approach with ML and hybrid approaches to obtain more reliable predictions. We dedicate two main sections to protein-protein and protein-ligand blind docking, presenting the reliability and caveats for each approach and outlining potential future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.