Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471250›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Diagnostic Approaches for Measles Virus: Methods, Advances, and Ongoing Challenges.

Yuan-Chao Xue, Ping Ren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuan-Chao XueDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3306-3596
Ping RenDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4022-6667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measles, also known as rubeola, is a highly contagious and potentially life-threatening disease caused by the measles virus. It classically presents with fever, cough, coryza, conjunctivitis, and a maculopapular rash. Despite the availability of an effective vaccine for decades, measles outbreaks continue to occur globally, largely driven by declining vaccination coverage and increased international travel. With no specific antiviral therapy available, rapid and accurate diagnosis remains essential for timely clinical management and effective outbreak control. Diagnostic methods have evolved from traditional virus isolation in cell culture to serologic assays and, more recently, to molecular techniques such as real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). Each diagnostic method has unique advantages and limitations influenced by specimen type, timing of collection, and laboratory capacity. This minireview summarizes the progress of measles virus diagnostics, outlines current laboratory detection strategies, and discusses emerging technologies and ongoing challenges amid global measles resurgence and increasing public health demands.

Indexed as

MeaslesMeasles virusMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesDisease OutbreaksHumansclinical microbiologylaboratory diagnosticsmeasles virus

Identifiers

PMID41471250
PMCPMC12736324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.