Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471249›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Immune Responses and Protective Efficacy of Nanoemulsion-Adjuvanted Monkeypox Virus Recombinant Vaccines Against Lethal Challenge in Mice.

Congcong Zhang, Nuo Liu, Yanqi Zhao, Zhendong Pan, Dawei Wang, Wanda Tang, Yanhua He, Xu Zheng, Zhongtian Qi, Xinxin Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Congcong ZhangDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Nuo LiuDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Yanqi ZhaoShanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
Zhendong PanDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Dawei WangDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Wanda TangDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Yanhua HeDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Xu ZhengDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0009-0004-9859-1909
Zhongtian QiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Xinxin ZhangShanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
Ping ZhaoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

the National Key Research & Development Program of China 2022YFC2304100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing global monkeypox outbreak since 2022 has highlighted the urgent need for vaccine development. Current vaccination strategies rely on cross-protective immunity provided by orthopoxvirus-based live-attenuated vaccines. However, these vaccines not only exhibit suboptimal efficacy against monkeypox virus (MPXV) but also raise safety concerns, particularly given the significant global overlap between MPXV infections and HIV. Owing to their superior safety profile and accessibility, recombinant subunit vaccines represent a highly promising platform for monkeypox vaccine development. In this study, we developed a subunit vaccine comprising A29L, B6R, and M1R antigens formulated with a proprietary nanoemulsion adjuvant and evaluated its immunogenicity and protective efficacy. In mice immunized with a prime-boost regimen of the three individual antigens combined with the nanoemulsion adjuvant, comparable serum IgG levels against each antigen were elicited. Both A29 and M1 formulations induced serum antibodies with potent neutralizing activity against MPXV and Vaccinia virus Western Reserve strain (VACV-WR). Notably, M1 antiserum exhibited stronger neutralization than A29 antiserum, whereas B6R immune serum showed no significant neutralizing activity. Splenocytes from B6R-immunized mice mounted a robust IFN-γ response, which was markedly lower in those immunized with A29 or M1. All three monovalent vaccines conferred complete survival following an intranasal lethal MPXV challenge, with M1 providing the strongest protection. In a lethal VACV-WR challenge model, only M1 immunization conferred significant protection. Histopathological analysis of lung tissues on day 5 post-infection revealed more pronounced inflammatory features in B6R-immunized mice compared to the nanoemulsion adjuvant control group. Furthermore, the nanoemulsion-adjuvanted bivalent A29L + B6R formulation induced significantly higher IgG and neutralizing antibody titers and demonstrated superior protective efficacy compared to the aluminum hydroxide-adjuvanted formulation. This comparative preclinical evaluation provides important evidence to support the development of a safe and effective subunit vaccine against monkeypox.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineMonkeypox virusMpox, MonkeypoxViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEmulsionsFemaleImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanoparticlesVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEmulsionsImmunoglobulin GVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccineshistopathologylethal challengemonkeypox virusnanoemulsion adjuvantneutralizing antibodyrecombinant vaccinevaccinia virus

Identifiers

PMID41471249
PMCPMC12735760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.