Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41471019›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Mild Two-Step Thermochemical Recovery of Clean Glass Fibers from Wind-Blade GFRP.

AbdulAziz AlGhamdi, Imtiaz Ali, Salman Raza Naqvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

AbdulAziz AlGhamdiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia.
Imtiaz AliDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar 34754, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-6164
Salman Raza NaqviDepartment of Engineering and Chemical Sciences, Karlstad University, 651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4035-181X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-of-life wind turbine blade accumulation is a growing global materials management problem and current industrial recycling routes for glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites remain limited in material recovery value. There is limited understanding on how to recover clean glass fibers while keeping thermal exposure and energy input low, and existing studies have not quantified whether very short isothermal thermal residence can still result in complete matrix removal. The hypothesis of this study is that a mild two-step thermochemical sequence can recover clean glass fibers at lower temperature and near zero isothermal dwell if pyrolysis and oxidation are separated. We used wind-blade epoxy-based GFRP in a step-batch reactor and combined TGA-based thermodynamic mapping, short pyrolysis at 425 °C, and mild oxidation at 475 °C with controlled dwell from zero to thirty minutes. We applied model-free kinetics and machine learning methods to quantify activation energy trends as a function of conversion. The thermal treatment of 425 °C for zero minutes in nitrogen, followed by 475 °C for fifteen minutes in air, resulted in mechanically sound, visually clean white fibers. These fibers retained 76% of the original tensile strength and 88% of the Young's modulus, which indicates the potential for energy-efficient GFRP recycling. The activation energy was found to be approximately 120 to 180 kJ mol

Indexed as

glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP)thermochemical recyclingtwo-step pyrolysis–oxidationwind turbine blade waste

Identifiers

PMID41471019
PMCPMC12737049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.